LLMs, agents, knowledge graphs, semantic layers and dashboards are only as good as the entities underneath them. When the same customer lives in four systems under three names, each of them sees a different set of customers, and none of them can tell.
For agents. Every agent shares one identity layer, so two agents never disagree about who a customer is.
Three companies to the dashboard, three nodes to the graph, three answers to the agent. It is one company.
The same customer lives in your CRM, billing system, support desk and product database, spelled differently in each. A person reading those rows sees one customer. A dashboard, a retrieval pipeline, a knowledge graph or an agent sees four.
Most teams patch this downstream, one system at a time: a fuzzy join in a transformation model, a dedup step in the RAG pipeline, a merge rule in the graph loader. Each fix is local, each disagrees with the others, and none of them gives the entity a stable identifier the next system can use.
The result is AI that is confidently inconsistent. The agent and the dashboard disagree about how many customers you have, and nobody can say which one is right. The fix is a shared identity layer underneath all of them.
Retrieval returns part of a customer’s history and misses the rest, because it was written differently.
Counts, segments and lifetime value are computed on duplicate rows, not real entities.
“Acme Inc” and “Acme Incorporated” become two nodes, and their relationships are split between them.
Resolve entities once, in the data platform where the data already lives, and give each one a persistent ID. Then point every downstream system at that layer: retrieval, knowledge graphs, semantic models, dashboards and agents all join on the same ID instead of doing their own matching.
Fixes stop being local. When a match improves, every consumer gets it at once, and when two systems disagree, they are disagreeing about data, not about who a customer is.
Retrieval, graphs, metrics and dashboards all read this one entity.
Matching happens in one place, below every tool that reads the data.
Each entity keeps the same ID as data changes, so links and history hold.
Dashboards, graphs, retrieval and agents share one answer to “who is this?”.
Retrieve everything known about the right entity, not similar-sounding strangers.
Learn moreResolved nodes in, trustworthy graph out, with relationships across people and companies.
Learn moreDefine metrics on one resolved entity so every count means the same thing.
Learn moreAccurate counts, segments and dashboards without double-counted customers.
Learn moreZingg runs as a workload inside your data platform and gives every entity one persistent ZINGG_ID. Everything above it reads the same resolved entities.
The same layer powersCustomer Analytics & MarketingFinancial Crime & RiskPrivacy & ComplianceSupply Chain & ProcurementProduct 360Master Data Management
Every resolved entity keeps one global ID across systems and runs. ZINGG_ID
Matching learned from your labels, combined with deterministic rules where you have them. How Zingg matches
Only new and changed records are matched, and IDs persist. Incremental flow
Runs on Databricks, Snowflake, Microsoft Fabric, Google Cloud or AWS. Data never leaves your account.
A shared set of resolved entities, each with one persistent ID, that every downstream system reads. Zingg builds it inside your data platform by matching records across your sources.
Models and agents reason over the records they are given. If one customer is four records, the model sees four customers, and no prompt can fix data it never received correctly.
No. Zingg resolves entities and adds a ZINGG_ID. The tools you already use keep doing retrieval, graph queries and metrics, on resolved entities.
Inside your own data platform: Databricks, Snowflake, Microsoft Fabric, Google Cloud or AWS.
Build the identity layer in your own data platform, then point every model, metric and agent at it.