Catalogs collect duplicates: a product re-created with a new SKU, a variant entered as its own item, a supplier sending the same product under a new code. Each one splits stock, reviews and sales, and none of them shows up in an exact-match check.
Three listings for one product. Shoppers see different prices and split reviews, and the warehouse counts three items.
Duplicate SKUs rarely look like duplicates. One says “1L”, another “1 Litre”, a third “33.8 fl oz”. One puts the brand in capitals, another abbreviates the product type. One was created by a supplier upload, another by hand. An exact match on title or code finds none of them.
The cost is spread across the business. Stock is split, so one listing sells out while its twin sits unsold. Reviews and ratings are divided, so a strong product looks unproven. Search shows the same item several times at different prices, and every report counts the product more than once.
Manual cleanup is slow and it never ends. Catalog teams compare listings by eye, a few hundred at a time, while new duplicates arrive with every supplier feed.
One listing sells out while its duplicate holds the inventory.
Ratings are spread across copies, so good products look untested.
Shoppers see the same product several times at different prices.
Compare listings on what they describe, not how they are written. Normalise units and formats, ignore filler words, and match on the combination of brand, product type, size, variant and any codes that are present.
Group duplicates under one ID and decide once which listing survives. Then check every new listing and supplier feed against the existing catalog before it goes live, so duplicates stop arriving.
1 L and 33.8 fl oz are the same size. The match does not depend on how the unit is written.
Units, case and formats are standardised before listings are compared.
All copies of a product share one ID, so merging is a single decision.
Incoming listings are checked against the catalog before they go live.
Zingg runs as a workload inside your data platform and gives every entity one persistent ZINGG_ID. Everything above it reads the same resolved entities.
The same layer powersCustomer Analytics & MarketingFinancial Crime & RiskPrivacy & ComplianceSupply Chain & ProcurementMaster Data ManagementAI & Data Foundations
Label a few pairs of your own listings and Zingg learns what a duplicate means for your products. How Zingg matches
Remove filler words and standardize fields so formatting differences do not hide duplicates.
The incremental flow matches new and updated items against existing products. Incremental flow
Review the evidence for each group before merging. Explainability
Duplicates usually differ in how the title, units or brand are written, and codes are often missing or different. Exact matching only finds copies that are identical.
No. Zingg groups duplicates under one ZINGG_ID and writes the result to your data platform. You decide which listing survives and apply it in your catalog.
Yes. You label examples of what counts as the same product and what counts as a different variant, and Zingg learns that distinction from your data.
Millions of items. Zingg learns which records are worth comparing, so it does not compare every listing with every other.
Find duplicate listings across your catalog, in your own data platform.